- Joined
- Mar 23, 2007
- Messages
- 3,993
Well I had always known that was the "point", I just don't like how it was executed at all. But that's Gaga.
What I meant is that Nick Knight mostly only takes photographs for covers, so he may only have taken the picture of gaga (and possibly the bike). The other works of Nick Knight I was referring to were Bjork, Bowie, Cheryl Cole etc.Berserk wrote:If it says Nick Knight and The Haus of Gaga, then I'm sure Nick Knight played a part. If it looks worse than what Nick Knight and The Haus of Gaga normally come up with, then I'm sure it's intentional.
Seriously, why is this hard for people to grasp? Bad Cover = trollolol, end of story. Lady Gaga felt like making the cover campy and controversial, which is totally not surprising at all. I don't see why people expect the cover to be more glamorous than the content of the album anyways.
The lesson we can all learn here is to quit taking her so seriously all the time.
PureElegance wrote:Because that one's not bad and not as lame as Lady Gaga's head on a motorcycle, imo. I don't know what there is to complain about.Orunitier wrote:I'm surprised no one's mentioned the "Judas" cover.
Besides, I don't know why the method used has to matter. I mean, you're making it seem as if using MICROSOFT WORD is something we should find fault with
Because it wasn't as important to me as your going on about MICROSOFT WORD. I thought that was weird because good things can come from it!Orunitier wrote:Yeah, just like everyone else is making it seem as if Nick Knight's design is something we should find fault with ::kisaki::
The point is, it's no ones "fault". It's intentional. I like how you ignored that part of my post though.
With the trolling thing, I'm mostly talking about Berserk. But you talked about the 'it's intentional' thing, which kind of went along with what he repeatedly said for the longest time (I guess it really mattered to him).Orunitier wrote:I don't know what post you read, but I never said I liked the cover. It's hideous. The concept is okay, execution...not so much. And I never said she was trolling.
I actually heard a really sensible explanation for this. The reasoning is that if the venue doesn't pay attention to every last outlandish detail on the dressing rooms, they probably also didn't pay attention on the stage setup where there are actual quality and safety issues if it's done wrong. If your box of Lucky Charms with ONLY red balloon marshmallows is missing, better start double-checking the electrical wiring too.holylampposts wrote:I never understood why people who need everything perfect don't supply it all theirselves.
I think it's more to do with the fact that the crowd gets quite rowdy and things like ice or hard cups would be a hazard.flowersofnight wrote:EDIT: also - I was highly amused by the extreme precautions in that rider to prevent people from throwing drinks at Gaga. Does that happen often?
Garnet in the Eden wrote:It was okay, I'm more excited about the uncut version.