- Joined
- Aug 5, 2004
- Messages
- 5,388
boi de memoire wrote:what's un-nonke? =S
not not gay. Only to be used by certain people.
boi de memoire wrote:what's un-nonke? =S
MiniKitty wrote:~
now i feel like the form freak. XD
I feel the same. Another forum I go to has a large amount of non-straight people.... but there are very few exclusive lesbians; most the girls are bi (in fact I'm one of the few girls who is not bi) and all the non-straight boys are strictly gay. It's very strange.faith wrote:But if you look at the pole I think you'll notice something. The un-nonke guys (except for that 1 lone person) are all gay, while the girls are all bi.
I really do think girls are more likely to become bi than guys are due to culture or genetics or horomones or whatever.
They're called Lipstick Lesbians. xDFlorescent Muffin wrote:A lot of girls do it because they think it's cool or something. I don't think of trends enough to something so ignorant.
And I agree. Even with old stars its been like "HI, I'm COMING OUT NOW!".Its not that its "in" to be gay. It's just that in this time and age its getting easier to come out of the closet and so people are doing it earlier than was usual.
sailorKa wrote:They're called Lipstick Lesbians. xD
As for the gay thing being a "fad"... well, I could agree to some degree(like, has anyone seen those pages completely dedicated to pictures of emo boys kissing each other?! geez...) but as this one person on a GLBTQ podcast said:
Its not that its "in" to be gay. It's just that in this time and age its getting easier to come out of the closet and so people are doing it earlier than was usual.
Actually there is very little evidence supporting the thesis that homosexuality is environmental. Everything is pointing towards genetics, particularly prenatal hormones. You're born however you are, and that's it. Experimenting with homosexuality is very different than actually being oriented as a homosexual. Any influence that personal experience has on your sexual choices doesn't dictate what your orientation is, but how you approach your orientation. (I had to write a research paper on the subject last year for my psych class.)faith wrote:I think it's been pretty well documented that sexual orientation is partually influenced by the way someone was brought up and the experiences they've had as a child/teen/adult whatnot. The question is just how much of it is genetic, and how much is culture
navate wrote:Actually there is very little evidence supporting the thesis that homosexuality is environmental. Everything is pointing towards genetics, particularly prenatal hormones. You're born however you are, and that's it. Experimenting with homosexuality is very different than actually being oriented as a homosexual. Any influence that personal experience has on your sexual choices doesn't dictate what your orientation is, but how you approach your orientation. (I had to write a research paper on the subject last year for my psych class.)faith wrote:I think it's been pretty well documented that sexual orientation is partually influenced by the way someone was brought up and the experiences they've had as a child/teen/adult whatnot. The question is just how much of it is genetic, and how much is culture
No, you're right.faith wrote:Hm? I thought Lipstick Lesbians are lesbians who are uber girly and like uber girly girls...then, I wouldn't know I suppose.
Agreed.sailorKa wrote:Its not that its "in" to be gay. It's just that in this time and age its getting easier to come out of the closet and so people are doing it earlier than was usual...And teens experimenting with their sexual orientation has been happening since the dawn of time, its just less "embarrassing" and more normal to talk about it now
inertia wrote:MiniKitty wrote:~
now i feel like the form freak. XD
Don't. I'm just the same, right down to the soft spot for ruffled shirts.
It was in earlier versions of the DSM, and gradually got toned down till they removed it altogether in the '80s. I think DSM-III was the last to list homosexuality in any form as a disorder.m10mfrk wrote:I'm not exactly sure how the story goes, but didn't homosexuality use to be under the US list of human disorders for a while till it was taken off a few years ago...